🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently spent years building community backing and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards indicated the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.