🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, the average family spends $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I can name multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.